"Are We There Yet?" Blog
Here's an excerpt:
I could write a book about how large families are no more strain on the environment than any other group of ten or twelve people; we are in fact less strain on the planet because we share space and resources as a unit and are forced by monetary constraints to be frugal. I could also talk your ear off about how the only environment that really requires our attention is the moral environment and that all other responsibilities flow from its health and well-being. Then I could go on and on about how my ten children are not deprived but enriched because they're not spoiled by material possessions; they learn to share with their many brothers and sisters for the happiness of all. And, I could recite all of this to you fairly dispassionately.
But the one accusation that gets my hackles up is that the child of a large family must necessarily be neglected -- as their parents could not possibly "do it all." POPPYCOCK! Anyone who thinks this knows not of what they speak. They are sadly ignorant.
I had never thought of a good response to people's idea that having a large family is socially irresponsible. I really enjoyed reading that paragraph and checking out her blog! Thanks.
ReplyDeleteExcellent! Thanks, I'll be checking out her blog too. I've "only" got seven, but you know the looks :D
ReplyDelete